A spear in the chest and subsequent events [Ray Anderson, ISSS 1998 Plenary
Session, July 22/98]
These notes are a rough transcription,
prepared as each individual presenter and/or commentator spoke at the ISSS
1998 conference. Gaps and errors have likely occurred. For more accurate
citations, please consult the original presenters. These notes have been
contributed to the ISSS by David Ing, of the IBM Advanced Business Institute
(sabi@systemicbusiness.org).
[Plenary session, July 22/98, 10:15 a.m.]
Ray Anderson
-
Entrepreneur, president and CEO of Interface Inc., world's largest producer
of floor covering.
-
Georgia Tech alum, engineering
-
Believes not only the right thing to do, the smart thing to do.
-
Recognized for pioneering efforts as co-chair of president's council on
sustainable development.
-
Will give talk about the second industrial revolution.
Asked people to stand up and give a hug.
-
All on the same spaceship.
Usually style is to disturb, but sees that we've already been disturbed.
How his company understand sustainability, and how they approach it.
Chart: net sales and EBITDA
-
First free-lay carpet tiles for offices.
-
Today, global 110 countries, 29 factories
-
Make and sell 40% of carpet tiles on earth, also produce broadloom.
-
1996, $1 billion sales, 1998 $1.3 billion.
First 21 years, never thought about what we were taking from the earth,
and doing to the earth.
-
Summer 1994, read The Ecology of Commerce -- Paul Hawkins
-
Had been asked to make a speech, design people asking sales (manufacturing,
R&D) people didn't have an answer on what they were doing for the environment.
-
Had a task force, asked to give a vision.
-
Already at future time, looking back.
-
Sustainable, possibly restorative, from Paul Hawkins' book.
Every living system and life-support system is in stress and decline.
-
Rivers, lakes, oceans, wetlands, farmlands, air, stratosphere.
-
Species disappearing.
-
Nuclear cleanup at cost.
-
Unemployment, poverty.
-
Natural capital, lots burned into CO2.
Hawkins posed: who would lead? Looked in the mirror.
-
To what? The next industrial revolution.
-
The first industrial revolution is not working.
Dana Meadows article: Places to intervene in a system. (Whole Earth Review)
-
Adjust regulating negative feedback loops, changing the goals of the system.
-
But #1, challenge the mindset / paradigm / mental model behind the system.
-
Lots of systems: transportation, government, education, human, industrial,
...
Mindset behind industrial revolution:
-
Earth as an inexhaustible source of resources.
-
Relevant time frame: human being; for business, just the next quarter.
-
Human dominion, doesn't need other species.
-
Technology is omnipotent, when combined with left brain human intelligence
-- rational.
-
Invisible hand of the market.
Paul Hawkins says new industrial revolution needs to be based on a finite
earth.
-
The end of substitutes will come: air for water, ...
-
Time frames should be geologic, think of species.
-
Right brain: Caring, nurturing, is at least important as left brain, may
be more important.
-
Market must be redressed to keep it honest: price of a cigarette, barrel
of oil
-
Who's paying for mudslides, rising sea levels? Progeny: taxational tyranny.
Challenged people in 1994.
-
Have started a climb.
-
Financial results are not a coincidence. Share price has tripled.
Ultimate problem is the mindset.
How to communicate to company:
-
Saw movie -- Mindwalk, based on Capra's turning point: ideas interconnections
(albeit at subatomic level)
Interface logo:
-
Circle with thirds: processes, people, capital.
-
Suppliers --> circle --> customers
-
Supply chain, but not just supply chain.
-
Add earth's lithosphere (for most), small amount from earth's biosphere.
-
Connection to community.
-
This is the typical company of the 20th century.
Prototypical company of the 21st century -- the next industrial revolution.
Pursuing on 7 fronts (7 faces of sustainability)
-
Eliminate waste
-
Quality employing suggestions through TQM:
-
Not only materials, also wrong bills, etc.
-
Ideal is zero waste, found $70 million of waste in $725 million of sales.
-
Baseline 1994, 32% reduction in real savings.
-
Have reframed Quest for next three years, to cut waste again in half.
-
Benign emissions
-
Inventoried every stack -- started with 192 stacks, shut down 14 last year.
-
Factories shouldn't need outlets.
-
14 effluent pipes, have closed 12
-
Now trying to go upstream, with inputs from suppliers.
-
Bill McDonough, U. Virginia Architecture: filters at end of pipes have
no place to go.
-
Renewable energy, believe it should be solar in the long run.
-
Short-term fuel cells, etc.
-
Earth cries out for a carbon tax.
-
All fossil fuel generate is reframed as waste, puts emphasis on energy
-
Photovoltaic cell is being put into California, customers say they'll pay
for it.
-
Contract with Ontario Hydro for solar.
-
Closing the loop:
-
Introduces new natural cycle for new materials.
-
Introduces new technical cycle
-
Need to get to solar power.
-
Resource efficient transportation.
-
Hard to crack: videoconference, better cars.
-
Don't want to break contact with customers.
-
Want to rely on carbon offsets: signed up for Trees for Travel.
-
Fly 4000 miles, plant a tree as penance.
-
Sensitivity hookup
-
Redesign commerce itself
-
Prices at full cost, with externalities.
-
Shift from products to services.
-
Invested $100 million to get closer to customers.
-
Sell comfort, not carpets: retain ownership, customer leases it.
-
Has increased market share, at expense of inefficient competitors.
Company is ahead of the regulatory process
-
From 1.55 lb. of natural capital per dollar sales, in 1994, have reduced
to 1.2, while maintaining quality.
Environment impact equation:
-
I = P x A x T
-
Environmental Impact = Population x Affluence x Technology
First industrial revolution
-
Current technology = extractive, linear, was,
Must move to second industrial revolution:
-
I = P x A / T
-
renewal, cyclical, solar/hydrogen drive, benign, emulating nature (no waste),
focused on resource productivity (using what we lots of -- labour, less
on resources).
Ascendancy of women in management has come in the nick of time.
Questions
Change in mindsets: raping the environment is good for the individual in
the short term. Can we do this without regulation?
-
Do need regulation for cleanup, but envision a company so clean that it's
beyond environmental standards.
-
Department of Energy convened appliance industry:
-
Violent reaction, but one company doesn't care.
-
American division of Electrolux, because in Europe, they'll always be ahead
of Americans.
-
Regulation process is the floor, not the ceiling. Compliance is as bad
as the law allows.
-
Increasing resource efficiency is the rising tide.
-
China can't meet this.
-
Clinton says that his biggest fear is that China will get rich the same
way we did, because the world can't support it.
The most important place to intervene is at the paradigm. What approaches
to changing the paradigm work?
-
Changing the mind of the people is not easy.
-
Huge effort to open up the minds of the people: one year of spinning wheels,
before getting traction.
-
Experiential learning: created a company within a company, "One World Learning",
now offered externally.
-
About to publish a book, which is a compilation of learnings, hopes it
will appeal to business people.
-
Hope the financial people will read it, because there are financial benefits.
Should we continue to treat the population as objects? Father of 8 children.
As objects, they don't participate in the process. Synergy for everyone,
or generosity for a few? Had university declaration of human rights, need
universal declaration of human duties?
Navigate ...
... to the 1998 ISSS Conference (Rough) Transcription
Main Page
... to the ISSS home page at www.isss.org.